Military Infrastructure - We design, develop, manufacture, test and deploy operational infrastructure to rapidly deploy military and civilian capabilities for global operations. The products we manufacture meet the standards of the most regulated markets and support operations in the most extreme environments.
Our Marshall Matrix containers are mobile and modular, designed to provide flexible and rapid configuration for deployment in extreme environments, including temperatures from -51 to +60 degrees.
Military Infrastructure
C4ISR (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) products are delivered in both shielded and vehicle-mounted solutions.
Soldiers With The 168th Engineer Brigade, Mississippi Army National Guard Use Heavy Construction Equipment To Extend A Tank Firing Range And Build An Ammunition Holding Area At Novo Selo Training Area, Bulgaria,
We produce high-quality and sophisticated healthcare solutions for use in complex and challenging environments, resulting in the best patient outcomes. Integrated systems include energy management, waste management, water and food supply, and positive air pressure systems. We are experienced in the design and delivery of field 1, 2 and 3 mobile field hospitals that provide care in the best clinical environment from the point of injury to the patient's arrival at a major trauma unit.
We have over 70 years of experience designing and manufacturing shelter configurations to meet our customers' operational requirements. Functional shelters must also be in a highly regulated environment. The range of shelters includes: Workshops Laundry Shops Offices
We offer secure ISO containers ready for the transport and storage of ammunition and explosives under controlled environmental conditions. Customer configurations include: Tool Storage Tool Platforms and Transport Flooding. The design incorporates key features required by OME standards to address several critical threats: security; fire...
We design, manufacture and integrate the necessary camp infrastructure supports to support and protect complex operational infrastructure deployments. These include: Power Generation Power Distribution CBRN Filtration NEMP/EMI Protection Ballistic Protection Water Distribution Water Treatment Waste Treatment Fuel Systems
How To Win America's Next War
Mission Systems We design, develop, implement and integrate complex subsystems across a wide range of platforms,... Learn more
Managed Support Services Marshall offers a full range of managed support services to optimize uptime and reduce... Learn more
This site uses cookies as described in our cookie statement. If you accept the use of cookies, please continue to use our website. On February 19, 2022, naval elements of the Royal Netherlands are preparing landing craft for a new mission in the harsh arctic waters. Photo: Vidar Hall
Infrastructure is an essential way for people to interact with the natural environment in the Arctic region, as it facilitates access, connectivity, livelihoods and productivity. Arctic Institute Series 2022
Latvia's Russian Military Infrastructure Inspection Canceled
It examines infrastructure as a critical point of analysis for examining human impacts and needs in the Arctic, particularly in its mediating role, or as an interface between politics, government, people and the natural environment.
This article describes the Cold War development of the Olavsvern Naval Base as a strategic asset for NATO forces in the High North. The base is located on the side of a high mountain near Tromsø. The Olavsvern was widely used on patrols in the Barents Sea by naval vessels tracking Russian submarines. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Olavsvern was decommissioned in 2013 and sold to private investors. Meanwhile, Russia began to develop its military power in the Arctic. After Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014, Arctic infrastructure was again needed. As a result, Olavsvern was put back into military use in 2021, but this time into commercial ownership. The authors conclude that military infrastructure is expensive to build, maintain and operate in the Arctic. The decision to dismantle and sell special military infrastructure must be carefully considered: the future security situation can never be predicted with certainty.
This article describes the past, present and future of the Olavsvern Arctic Naval Complex (formerly Rumfjorden Base). During the Cold War, Norway built a base at Rumfjorden, a deep-water inlet 20 miles south of Tromsø. The base is steep and carved into the hillside. Protected by a 270-meter-thick gabbro roof, the mountain complex consists of a 340-meter-long mountain basin for submarines and fast patrol boats, a dry dock, workshops, ammunition stores, and command and logistics areas. Dipsy's docks, capable of handling larger vessels, including reactor-carrying submarines, barracks, officers' quarters, offices, and several workshops were built on the outer side of the mountain complex. After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, the base was decommissioned, demilitarized and sold to private investors in 2013. In 2020, WilNor Government Services (WGS), a specialist in military logistics services within the Wilhelmsen Group, acquired a majority stake and returned the base. for military use. The future role of Olavsvern is still uncertain, but the military situation in the Great North and the rapid return of military activity in Olavsvern offer some avenues for development. The current situation in Ukraine after a large-scale Russian attack has further increased tensions in the north: Russia is conducting submarine and intercontinental ballistic missile exercises in the Barents Sea, showing NATO its defense capabilities. Norway and its allies respond by expressing their intentions to protect their land and Norway's large maritime area 1) Stagen, A (2022) Relations with Russia in the North have been strained. Now it's getting worse. Washington State: Arctic Institute. https:///relations-russia-north-strained-worse/. Expires on 20 March 2022. This situation will further accentuate the need for NATO's military infrastructure in the High North.
The development of Olavsvern from a military fuel depot to a major NATO naval base took four decades, beginning in the early 1950s. Estimated total construction costs. NOK four billion ($450 million) was largely funded by NATO.
Russia Disabled Ukranian Military Infrastructure With Precision Strikes, Civilians Safe
We first look at the development and operational use of Olavsvern during the Cold War, before touching on the Norwegian Parliament's decision to adopt it, and finally consider recent military use under private ownership and future developments. We end the article with some reflections from the Olavsvern case.
Norway became one of the 12 founding members of NATO in 1949. The country shares a common border with Russia in the north, a large area of Arctic Ocean territory, and a long coastline with a sparse population. Norway's effective defense required Allied reinforcements in times of crisis and war. Thus, a collective defense guarantee from NATO has always been important for Norway. In parallel with the NATO agreement, Norway developed a strong bilateral relationship with US military support, which was considered more important than NATO due to the strength of US military forces that could be deployed to Norway in a crisis scenario. In January 1950, Norway and the United States signed a formal mutual military assistance treaty. Since the beginning of their relationship, the United States has put significant pressure on Norway to arm itself. This pressure was exacerbated by financial incentives: the US was willing to cover parts of the defense investment before Norway also contributed.2) Nølstad O (2008) Jens Chr Haug - Fult og. Oslo: Ashekhug
Naval weaponry and access to the deep sea were important elements in the conflict between the superpowers. The Soviet Union had a desire to develop a global fleet. The Cuban missile crisis and the US naval blockade underscored this fact. In addition, nuclear guided missile submarines (SSBNs) have become a key element of defense between adversaries.3) Terjesen V, Kristiansen T and Jelsten R (2010) Søforsvaret i krig og fred. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget
Since 1960, the construction of the Soviet deep-sea park accelerated. By the late 1960s, the Northern Fleet had emerged as the largest and most modern naval fleet of the four Soviet fleets. Russia favored the Northern Fleet because the Kola Peninsula offered better access to the Atlantic than the Baltic and Black Seas. In conflict situations, the fleets from the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea are not allowed to enter the strait through the Oresund, and the Bosphorus can thus cease to operate in the Atlantic.4) Terjesen V, Kristiansen T and Jelsten R (2010) Søforsvaret i krig og fred Bergen: Fagbokforlaget
China Rapidly Building Infrastructure For Its Military Along Lac
In 1962, one fifth of the total maritime tonnage of the Soviet Union consisted of submarines. This proportion increased to nearly half of all tons in 1981. Since 1958, the Soviet Union has built a large number of nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) to patrol the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. As the range of ballistic missiles increased, Soviet SSBNs were able to patrol closer to their home waters, making them less vulnerable to detection and attack by Allied submarines. This eventually led to the Soviet bastion doctrine around the Kola Peninsula, where Soviet SSBNs could remain in the Barents Sea, protected by Soviet attack and surface submarines.
Hyperconverged infrastructure, hybrid infrastructure, political military economic social infrastructure and information, infrastructure services, managed infrastructure, infrastructure automation, infrastructure, converged infrastructure, public infrastructure, infrastructure monitoring, infrastructure management, ai infrastructure
0 Comments